20,000 AI-Generated Songs Uploaded To Deezer Every Single Day

Forbes - Apr 16th, 2025

Deezer, a popular streaming platform, is experiencing a significant surge in AI-generated music, which now accounts for almost a fifth of all new uploads. The company reports over 20,000 AI-generated songs being added daily, a figure that has nearly doubled since January. Deezer's chief innovation officer, Aurelien Herault, highlights the ongoing challenge of managing this influx while ensuring genuine artists' rights are protected. Deezer utilizes advanced AI detection tools to identify fully AI-generated content, aiming to shield creators' revenue, which is at risk of declining by 2028.

The broader context highlights the rapid growth of AI in the music industry, driven by numerous generative AI tools available for music creation. While AI offers potential benefits, concerns about copyright infringement and revenue loss for traditional musicians persist. Deezer emphasizes the importance of responsible AI development to maintain transparency and fairness, preventing AI from wholly replacing human creativity. The global AI music market is projected to grow significantly, reflecting the increasing integration of AI in music production and the complex dynamics between technology and creativity.

Music Industry Copyright Deezer Ai Generated Music Aurelien Herault Streaming Platforms Ai Detection Tools Revenue Protection

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the rise of AI-generated music on Deezer, highlighting significant trends and challenges. It effectively uses data and quotes from Deezer to support its claims, contributing to its accuracy and timeliness. However, the reliance on a single perspective limits its balance and source quality, while the lack of detailed methodological transparency slightly detracts from its credibility. The article is well-written and accessible, engaging readers on a topic of growing public interest, though it could benefit from more diverse viewpoints and broader context to enhance its impact and engagement.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims about the prevalence and impact of AI-generated music on Deezer. It states that AI-generated music constitutes almost a fifth of all new uploads, with Deezer receiving over 20,000 AI-generated songs daily. These figures align with industry reports and statements from Deezer officials, suggesting a high degree of accuracy. However, specific details about the effectiveness of Deezer's AI detection tool and the projected financial impact on the music industry require further verification. The claim that Deezer's tool can detect 100% AI-generated songs from common tools is particularly ambitious and needs corroboration from independent evaluations.

Balance

The article primarily presents Deezer's perspective on the challenges posed by AI-generated music, including quotes from Deezer's chief innovation officer. While it acknowledges the potential benefits of AI in music creation, it does not provide viewpoints from independent experts or musicians who might have differing opinions on AI's role in the industry. This creates a slight imbalance, as the narrative focuses heavily on the risks and challenges without equally exploring the opportunities or positive impacts AI might have for artists.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey the rise of AI-generated music on Deezer. It logically progresses from presenting the problem to discussing potential impacts and solutions. The tone remains neutral and informative, making the content accessible to a general audience. However, some technical aspects, such as how AI detection tools work, could be explained in more detail to enhance understanding for readers unfamiliar with AI technology.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on statements from Deezer and its representatives, which are credible sources for information about the company's operations and tools. However, the absence of external sources or independent verification of claims, such as the effectiveness of AI detection tools, limits the depth of reporting. Including perspectives from industry analysts or academic experts on AI in music would enhance the reliability and breadth of the article's source base.

Transparency

The article clearly attributes statements to Deezer and provides some context about the challenges of AI-generated music, such as potential copyright issues. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the methodologies behind Deezer's AI detection tool or the data supporting the projected financial impacts. Greater transparency about how conclusions were reached, particularly regarding the AI tool's capabilities, would improve the article's credibility.