5 cancer types where screenings save the most lives

Fox News - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on Fox News

A study led by the NIH's National Cancer Institute, published in JAMA Oncology, highlights the significant impact of improvements in cancer screenings and prevention strategies on reducing deaths from five common cancers: breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate, between 1975 and 2020. The research found that these interventions prevented 5.94 million deaths, with 80% attributed to screenings and prevention, rather than treatment advances. Quitting smoking was notably beneficial, preventing 3.45 million lung cancer deaths. While the study underscores the importance of prevention and screening, it acknowledges limitations, as it focused on only five cancer types and did not consider the potential risks of screenings. Experts emphasize the need for optimizing prevention and screening, especially for underserved populations, and developing new strategies for other lethal cancers.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of a study on cancer prevention and screening, highlighting significant findings and expert opinions. While it is informative and draws from credible sources, there are areas for improvement in balance and transparency.

RATING DETAILS

9
Accuracy

The article accurately reports the findings of the study led by the National Institutes of Health and references specific data and expert opinions. The information appears to be precise and verifiable.

7
Balance

The article primarily presents the perspective of the study and experts supporting the benefits of screening and prevention. It lacks a diverse range of viewpoints, such as those questioning the efficacy or potential risks of screenings.

8
Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. However, it could benefit from a more neutral tone, as some language appears promotional, particularly in expert quotes.

8
Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including the NIH, NCI, and medical professionals. However, it could improve by including more varied sources beyond Fox News Digital and iStock images.

7
Transparency

The article mentions the limitations of the study, such as its focus on only five cancer types and lack of consideration for quality of life. However, it does not disclose potential conflicts of interest or affiliations of the quoted experts.