AP report: California man who messaged Wisconsin shooter and planned own attack ordered to surrender guns

A California judge has ordered a 20-year-old man from Carlsbad to surrender his firearms and ammunition after police discovered he was communicating with Natalie Rupnow, a teen who carried out a school shooting in Wisconsin. The man was allegedly planning a mass shooting with Rupnow and had discussed targeting a government building using explosives. A restraining order was issued under California's gun red flag law, effective until December 23, with a hearing set for January 3. The police said Rupnow, a 15-year-old student, killed a student and a teacher and wounded six others at Abundant Life Christian School in Madison before taking her own life. The motives for Rupnow's actions remain unclear. It was not confirmed if the man was in custody as of Wednesday evening.
RATING
The article provides a factual report on a legal action taken against a man in California related to a school shooting in Wisconsin. While it offers key details about the incident and legal proceedings, it lacks comprehensive sourcing and presents a singular perspective without deeper context or multiple viewpoints.
RATING DETAILS
The article appears factually accurate based on the information provided, detailing the issuance of a restraining order and the alleged communications between the individuals involved. However, it lacks specific sources or references to verify these facts, such as official statements or court documents.
The article primarily presents the perspective of law enforcement and the judicial action taken. It lacks input or commentary from other stakeholders, such as legal experts, the accused's representation, or those close to the case, which could provide a more rounded view.
The article is generally clear and straightforward in its presentation of facts, though it could benefit from better structuring and avoidance of unrelated content, such as the streaming service promotion at the end.
There is no attribution to specific sources like police reports, official statements, or credible news outlets. The reliance on 'according to police' without named sources or documents reduces the source quality.
The article provides basic information about the incident and legal actions but does not disclose any conflicts of interest or affiliations. Additionally, it lacks transparency about the evidence or methods used to gather the presented information.