Apple's M4 MacBook Air is back on sale for $150 off

Engadget - May 12th, 2025

Amazon has announced a significant discount on Apple's latest M4 MacBook Air, offering a $150 reduction on the base model, bringing the price down to $849 from the original $999. This deal is available exclusively for the midnight color option and applies to the entry-level model equipped with 16GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. For those needing more storage or memory, Amazon is offering similar discounts on models with higher specifications, including the 512GB SSD and 24GB RAM variants. These reductions represent the lowest prices seen for these models since their release.

The MacBook Air M4, released in mid-March, has been hailed as the best MacBook of 2025 by Engadget, scoring a high review rating of 92 for its performance and design. The 13-inch model features a 10-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine, providing ample power for everyday tasks. Moreover, its battery life excels, lasting over 18 hours during HD video playback tests. The discount also extends to the 15-inch version, which boasts a larger display and improved audio features, making these deals highly attractive for consumers seeking high-performance laptops at more affordable prices.

Amazon Discount Apple Mac Book Air M4 Chip Engadget

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a well-rounded and accurate report on the current discounts available for the Apple M4 MacBook Air, backed by credible sources and consistent with verified information. Its strengths lie in its clarity, timeliness, and relevance to consumer interests, making it a valuable resource for potential buyers.

However, the article could benefit from greater transparency through explicit source citation and a more balanced presentation by including critical perspectives or comparisons with competitors. While the article effectively engages its target audience, broader engagement could be enhanced by expanding its scope to address wider market trends or product evaluations.

Overall, the article is a reliable and informative piece for consumers interested in purchasing a new MacBook Air, though it remains focused on immediate consumer benefits rather than broader societal or cultural impacts.

Accuracy

The news story is highly accurate in its factual claims about the discounts on the Apple M4 MacBook Air at Amazon. The reported $150 discount on the 13-inch model, reducing the price to $849, is corroborated by multiple independent sources. The details about the pricing for different configurations, including the 512GB SSD and 24GB RAM versions, are also consistent with verified information, indicating that these discounts represent all-time lows.

The story accurately describes the features and performance of the M4 MacBook Air, such as the 10-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine, as well as the battery life exceeding 18 hours, which are supported by product reviews. The only minor discrepancy is the claim that the discount is available only on the midnight color option, whereas some sources indicate that all colors might be discounted. This minor issue does not significantly impact the overall accuracy of the article.

Overall, the article provides precise and well-supported information about the current deals on the M4 MacBook Air, aligning closely with the factual data available from reliable sources.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the discounts and features of the Apple M4 MacBook Air, providing a consumer-centric perspective. While it effectively highlights the benefits of the current deals and the product's specifications, it lacks a broader range of viewpoints that could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the product's market position.

There is a noticeable absence of critical perspectives or potential downsides of the product, such as comparisons with competitors or discussion of any known issues with the MacBook Air M4. Including such viewpoints could have provided a more balanced view for potential buyers, helping them make more informed decisions.

However, the article does not exhibit overt favoritism; it maintains a neutral tone while discussing the product's features and pricing. The focus on consumer benefits and current deals is clear, but a more balanced representation of perspectives could enhance the article's completeness.

Clarity

The article is well-written, with a clear and logical structure that makes it easy to follow. The language is straightforward and accessible, effectively conveying the key points about the discounts and features of the M4 MacBook Air.

The information is presented in a concise manner, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the product or the deals available. This clarity helps readers quickly grasp the essential details without being overwhelmed by unnecessary information.

The tone is neutral and informative, suitable for a news article about consumer deals. Overall, the article's clarity is a strong point, aiding reader comprehension and engagement.

Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, such as Engadget, which is a well-respected platform for technology news and reviews. The information about the discounts and product specifications aligns with what is available from authoritative sources like Apple and major retailers, indicating a high level of reliability.

While the article does not explicitly cite its sources, the consistency of the information with verified data suggests that the sources used are trustworthy. The reliance on recognized technology news outlets and retailers adds to the credibility of the report.

However, the article could benefit from explicitly mentioning its sources, which would enhance transparency and allow readers to verify the claims independently. Overall, the source quality is strong, supporting the article's credibility.

Transparency

The article provides clear information about the discounts and product specifications but lacks explicit disclosure of its sources, which affects its transparency. While the data aligns with verified information, readers are not given direct access to the sources, which could enhance trust and allow for independent verification.

The article does not discuss the methodology used to determine the best discounts or how the information was gathered, which could provide readers with more context. Additionally, there is no mention of any potential conflicts of interest, such as partnerships with retailers, which could impact the impartiality of the reporting.

Improving transparency by citing sources and disclosing any affiliations would strengthen the article's credibility and provide readers with a clearer understanding of how the information was obtained.