Archeologists unearth 1700s signs of British control in Florida after Spanish rule

ABC News - Mar 28th, 2025

In St. Augustine, Florida, city archeologists have uncovered a dry moat, part of a British redoubt constructed in 1781, marking the first tangible archeological evidence of British military presence in the region. This discovery was made during excavations in the Lincolnville neighborhood to pave the way for a new residential project. The British took control of the area in 1763 and built several outposts, yet until now, none had been archeologically documented. The find sheds light on a largely forgotten 20-year British occupation that ended in 1783, providing a new dimension to the city's rich historical tapestry.

St. Augustine's unique archeological preservation ordinance, enacted in 1986, facilitated this significant find by allowing archeologists to document historical sites before construction projects commence. The city, founded in 1565, is the oldest continuously occupied European settlement in the U.S., with a history encompassing Spanish, British, and Native American influences. The newly discovered redoubt not only offers insights into British military strategies but also promises further revelations through the study of seeds found at the site, potentially elucidating the interplay between the fort's structure and local plant life.

Historic Preservation St. Augustine British Redoubt Archeological Discovery Andrea White Lincolnville Neighborhood

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

8.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a well-rounded account of a recent archaeological discovery in St. Augustine, highlighting its historical significance and the role of local preservation efforts. It scores highly on accuracy and clarity, offering a factual and accessible narrative supported by credible sources. The story effectively communicates the importance of the find within the broader context of St. Augustine's colonial history, though it could benefit from a wider range of perspectives to enhance balance. While the article may not have a broad impact or provoke significant controversy, it is timely and of interest to those passionate about history and preservation. Overall, the article is a reliable and engaging piece that contributes to the ongoing dialogue about historical preservation and the uncovering of forgotten chapters in history.

Accuracy

The article provides a largely accurate account of St. Augustine's historical significance and the recent archaeological discovery. The foundational claim that St. Augustine is the oldest continuously occupied European settlement in the U.S. is well-documented and widely accepted. Additionally, the timeline of British control from 1763 to 1783 is consistent with historical records. The article accurately describes the recent finding of a British redoubt, noting it as the first archaeological evidence of such structures in the area. However, the story could benefit from additional verification on the exact number of redoubts constructed by the British, as historical maps suggest seven, but this is not confirmed archaeologically. The mention of the archaeological preservation ordinance and its role in the discovery is also accurate and supported by local policies.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspective of city archaeologist Andrea White, offering insights into the significance of the discovery and the historical context of British rule in Florida. While this provides a focused narrative, it limits the range of perspectives. The story could be more balanced by including viewpoints from other historians or archaeologists to provide a broader context or differing interpretations. Additionally, the contractor's viewpoint adds a practical perspective on the impact of archaeology on construction, but more voices from the local community or historians specializing in British colonial history could enhance the balance.

Clarity

The article is well-structured, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the historical context, the discovery, and its implications. The language is clear and concise, making complex historical and archaeological concepts accessible to a general audience. The story maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual information and expert insights. There are no significant issues affecting comprehension, and the narrative effectively communicates the importance of the discovery within the broader historical context of St. Augustine.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on the expertise of city archaeologist Andrea White, whose professional background lends credibility to the claims. Her statements are central to the story, providing authoritative insights into the discovery's significance. The inclusion of a contractor's perspective adds a practical dimension, though it does not contribute to the historical accuracy. While the article would benefit from additional sources, such as independent historians or academic experts, the current sources are credible and relevant to the story's focus.

Transparency

The article is transparent about its sources, primarily quoting city archaeologist Andrea White and contractor Jason Heidgerken. It clearly outlines the basis for claims, such as the historical context of British rule and the role of the archaeological preservation ordinance. However, the methodology of the archaeological findings, such as how the moat was identified and the process of seed analysis, could be more thoroughly explained to enhance transparency. Additionally, the article could disclose any potential biases or conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the city's interest in promoting its historical significance.