As cases climb in the US, do you need another measles shot?

BBC - Mar 19th, 2025

Amid a surge in measles cases across the United States, individuals like Debra Eichenbaum are opting for an additional measles vaccine to protect vulnerable family members, such as her immunocompromised husband. The resurgence of this highly contagious disease, which had been declared eliminated in the US in 2000, has been exacerbated by rising vaccine skepticism post-Covid-19. Health officials report over 300 cases in 2025, with significant outbreaks in western Texas leading to the first measles death in a decade, a six-year-old girl. The outbreak has stirred anxiety among parents, especially those with young children who are not yet eligible for vaccination.

The story highlights the complexities and confusion surrounding vaccination for different age groups, particularly those vaccinated with possibly less effective doses in the 1960s. The US Department of Health and Human Services has deferred to CDC guidelines, leaving individuals to consult healthcare providers about additional vaccinations. The situation underscores the critical need for maintaining high vaccination rates to prevent further outbreaks, as measles spreads easily in under-vaccinated communities. Healthcare experts recommend vaccinations for anyone lacking presumptive immunity, and parents in affected areas are advised to consult pediatricians about potential early vaccinations for infants.

Vaccination Cdc Vaccine Skepticism Public Health Us Department Of Health And Human Services Measles Outbreak Debra Eichenbaum Robert F Kennedy Jr

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively addresses a critical public health issue, providing accurate and timely information about the rise in measles cases and the importance of vaccination. It draws on credible sources and expert opinions to support its narrative, although more explicit sourcing and a broader range of perspectives could enhance its balance and transparency. The article's clarity and readability make it accessible to a general audience, while its focus on public interest topics ensures its relevance and potential impact. However, the exploration of controversial topics like vaccine skepticism could be more comprehensive to provoke meaningful debate and engagement. Overall, the article succeeds in informing readers about the current measles situation and encouraging preventive action, while offering room for improvement in certain dimensions.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate, presenting key facts about the measles situation in the US, including the rise in cases and the first measles death in a decade. The claim that over 300 cases have been reported in 2025 across more than a dozen states aligns with CDC data, which confirms 301 cases by mid-March. The story accurately describes the historical context of measles elimination in 2000 and the subsequent rise due to vaccine skepticism. However, the narrative about vaccine shortages in Texas lacks specific confirmation, and the mention of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s mixed messages needs more substantiation. Overall, the article presents a truthful depiction of the measles situation, supported by credible sources, though some claims require further verification.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by including perspectives from individuals like Debra Eichenbaum and Kyle Rable, medical experts such as Donald Dumford III and Melissa Stockwell, and public health recommendations. However, it somewhat lacks a counterpoint to the vaccine skepticism narrative, particularly regarding Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s stance. While it mentions his mixed messages, it does not provide direct quotes or detailed context, which could help readers understand the full spectrum of opinions. The article could benefit from presenting more diverse viewpoints, especially from communities affected by measles outbreaks, to enhance its balance.

Clarity

The article is well-written, with a clear and logical structure that guides the reader through the measles situation and vaccination recommendations. It uses straightforward language and provides context for medical terms and concepts, making it accessible to a general audience. The narrative flows smoothly, with a coherent progression from individual stories to expert insights and public health information. The tone is neutral and informative, effectively conveying the seriousness of the measles outbreaks without sensationalism. Overall, the article's clarity enhances its readability and comprehension.

Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, including infectious disease specialists and public health experts, to support its claims. It references the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for factual information about measles cases and vaccination guidelines. The inclusion of expert opinions from prestigious institutions like Cleveland Clinic and Columbia University adds authority to the narrative. However, the absence of direct citations or links to these sources within the text slightly diminishes the transparency of source attribution. Overall, the sources are reliable, but more explicit attribution would enhance credibility.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative about the measles situation and vaccination recommendations, but it lacks transparency in sourcing and methodology. While it references experts and the CDC, it does not explicitly cite or link to specific reports or data sources, leaving readers to trust the information without direct evidence. Additionally, the article does not disclose potential conflicts of interest, such as affiliations of quoted experts, which could impact impartiality. Improved transparency in sourcing and disclosure would strengthen the article's credibility and trustworthiness.