Biden brain lie hurts Dems, stratospheric school spending and other commentary

New York Post - May 18th, 2025

Politico's Adam Wren and Holly Otterbein suggest that Joe Biden's perceived cognitive issues may have negatively impacted the Democratic Party's prospects for the 2024 presidential election. The reluctance of potential Democratic presidential contenders to address Biden's condition or urge him to step down sooner could hinder the party in future elections, particularly in 2028. While some Democrats believe distancing from Biden might pave the way for an outsider candidate, there is a risk of drawing unfavorable comparisons to past party tactics. This internal conflict highlights the ongoing struggle within the party to reconcile loyalty with electoral strategy.

In New York, the Empire State is planning a significant increase in educational spending, with an average of $35,012 per student, surpassing the national average and marking a 4.6% increase from the previous year. This rise in expenditure comes as the state budget boosts school aid by $1.7 billion, yet many districts are still set to increase property taxes by the maximum allowed under the state's cap. This financial strategy raises questions about the sustainability of such spending and its implications for taxpayers. Meanwhile, a shift in US-China trade relations is advocated by Oren Cass, who urges a gradual transition away from reliance on Chinese supply chains to stabilize the American economy and protect local communities. This recommendation reflects a broader reevaluation of international trade policies and their long-term impacts on domestic industries and workers.

Democratic Party Joe Biden 2024 Presidential Election Us China Trade Property Taxes Oren Cass New York School Spending Energy Regulations

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.6

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents a range of timely and relevant topics, including political strategy, economic policy, and international trade. While it engages with issues of public interest and has the potential to influence opinion, its impact is limited by a lack of comprehensive evidence and balanced perspectives. The story's accuracy is mixed, with some claims supported by reputable sources and others requiring further verification. The article is clear and readable, but it could benefit from greater transparency in sourcing and a more balanced representation of viewpoints. Overall, the article provides an engaging overview of current debates but would be strengthened by more rigorous sourcing and balanced analysis.

Accuracy

The article presents several claims that require verification, particularly regarding Joe Biden's cognitive condition and its impact on the Democratic Party's electoral prospects. While the claims about New York's school spending and property tax increases are detailed, they would need to be cross-referenced with official budget documents for confirmation. Assertions about U.S.-China trade relations and federal appliance regulations are based on specific arguments that should be corroborated with policy records and economic analyses. The accuracy of the claims is mixed, with some supported by external sources and others requiring more evidence.

Balance

The story features a range of perspectives, including political, economic, and libertarian viewpoints. However, it tends to lean towards a critical stance on Democratic strategies and policies, particularly regarding Biden and educational spending in New York. The article could benefit from a more balanced representation by including counterarguments or perspectives from those supporting the current policies. This imbalance suggests a potential bias in the selection and presentation of viewpoints.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with distinct sections addressing different topics. The language is straightforward, making the content accessible to a general audience. However, the transitions between topics could be smoother, as the article shifts abruptly from political analysis to economic commentary. Despite this, the overall presentation is coherent and easy to follow.

Source quality

The article references several sources, including Politico, the Empire Center, and The Wall Street Journal. While these are reputable sources, the article does not always provide direct citations or detailed attributions for its claims, particularly regarding Biden's cognitive condition and political strategy. The reliance on editorial opinions and commentary without clear sourcing for factual claims affects the overall reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of providing detailed sources or context for its claims. While it cites some sources, such as the Empire Center for school spending, it does not consistently disclose the basis for other assertions, particularly those related to political strategy and international trade. The absence of methodology or evidence supporting certain claims limits the reader's ability to assess the impartiality and validity of the content.

Sources

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/biden-original-sin-democratic-party/