Bill Belichick’s daughter-in-law takes a swipe at Jordon Hudson after disastrous CBS interview

New York Post - May 1st, 2025

Bill Belichick's recent interview on 'CBS Sunday Mornings' took an unexpected turn when his girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, interrupted to prevent questions about their relationship. This incident has sparked discussion about Hudson's role, with former NFL stars Julian Edelman and Rob Gronkowski suggesting on their podcast that she acts as his publicist. Comedian Nikki Glaser agreed with this notion, while Belichick's daughter-in-law Jennifer Schmitt criticized Hudson's behavior as unprofessional.

In response to the backlash, Belichick issued a statement defending Hudson, asserting that the interview was agreed to focus solely on his new book, 'The Art of Winning: Lessons From My Life in Football.' He claimed that Hudson intervened after unrelated topics were repeatedly introduced. However, CBS denied there was any such agreement. The situation highlights the challenges public figures face in managing personal and professional boundaries, and the scrutiny that comes with high-profile relationships.

Nfl Bill Belichick Jordon Hudson Julian Edelman The Art Of Winning Jennifer Schmitt Rob Gronkowski Cbs Sunday Mornings Publicist

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The news story provides a reasonably accurate account of the incident involving Bill Belichick's interview and the subsequent controversy. It effectively captures the key events and reactions from involved parties, maintaining clarity and engagement throughout. However, the story could benefit from more balanced perspectives, particularly from CBS and Jordon Hudson, to provide a fuller picture of the situation. The reliance on social media comments and the lack of direct quotes from some key figures slightly diminish the source quality and transparency. Overall, the article is timely and likely to engage readers interested in sports and entertainment, though its broader public interest and impact are limited.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports the incident involving Bill Belichick's interview on CBS Sunday Morning and the subsequent interruption by Jordon Hudson. Belichick's statement regarding the focus of the interview on his book and the CBS response denying any preconditions are correctly presented. However, the story lacks verification of Hudson's professional role as Belichick's publicist, which is a significant claim made by other sources such as Julian Edelman and Rob Gronkowski. The article also accurately captures Jennifer Schmitt's comments but does not provide further context or clarification on her intentions.

Balance

The article primarily presents perspectives from Belichick, Hudson, and Schmitt, with additional commentary from public figures like Julian Edelman, Rob Gronkowski, and Nikki Glaser. However, it lacks a balanced representation of CBS's side of the story and does not explore Hudson's viewpoint beyond her actions during the interview. The focus is more on the sensational aspects of the incident rather than providing a comprehensive view of all parties involved.

Clarity

The article is generally clear, with a straightforward narrative that outlines the key events and statements. The language is accessible, and the structure follows a logical flow from describing the incident to presenting reactions. However, the inclusion of multiple perspectives without clear attributions at times can lead to confusion about who made specific claims.

Source quality

The article cites statements from credible sources such as Bill Belichick and CBS, which adds reliability to the reporting. It also includes comments from public figures like Julian Edelman and Rob Gronkowski, who are relevant to the context. However, the reliance on social media comments and the lack of direct quotes from Hudson or Schmitt reduce the overall source quality.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency by quoting Belichick's statement and CBS's response. However, it does not clearly disclose the basis for some claims, such as Hudson's role as a publicist. The lack of direct input from Schmitt, despite attempts to contact her, also affects transparency. The article could benefit from more explicit disclosure of the sources and methods used to gather information.