China open to talks with Trump admin on lowering tariffs, ministry says

Fox News - May 2nd, 2025

China has announced a significant shift in its trade strategy by waiving tariffs on select U.S. goods, marking a potential de-escalation in the ongoing trade war with the Trump administration. This development follows a statement from the Chinese Commerce Ministry, indicating that China is 'evaluating' a U.S. offer to hold talks on tariffs. The move to waive tariffs on certain American-made products, including ethane imports, suggests a possible opening for the world's two largest economies to ease tensions that have disrupted global markets. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has expressed confidence that China is interested in reaching an agreement, acknowledging the complexity of the process and the need for gradual de-escalation.

Despite the apparent willingness to negotiate, the Chinese Commerce Ministry has cautioned against any coercive tactics, warning that attempts to use talks as leverage would be ineffective. This change in Beijing's messaging contrasts sharply with its earlier accusations at a U.N. Security Council meeting, where it criticized the U.S. for using tariffs as a means of global economic coercion. The potential for renewed discussions highlights the delicate balance of international trade relations and the broader implications for the global economic order. As both nations explore pathways to resolve their differences, the outcome of these talks could significantly impact international trade dynamics and economic stability.

Donald Trump China Xi Jinping Fox News Tariffs United States Scott Bessent Trade War Gatestone Institute

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides timely coverage of the ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations, highlighting recent developments and statements from key officials. It scores well in terms of timeliness and public interest due to the global significance of the topic. However, the article could improve in transparency and source quality by providing more direct sourcing and context for the claims made. While the article is generally clear and readable, it lacks in-depth analysis and engagement elements that could enhance reader understanding and interest. Overall, the article offers a solid overview of the situation but could benefit from more balanced perspective representation and detailed sourcing.

Accuracy

The article presents several key claims about the trade negotiations between the U.S. and China, notably the waiving of tariffs on certain U.S. goods by China and the potential for upcoming talks. The factual basis for these claims is supported by references to statements from the Chinese Commerce Ministry and U.S. officials, as translated by Reuters. However, the article does not provide direct quotes or links to the original statements, which would enhance verifiability. Additionally, the article mentions statements from President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which are central to the narrative but lack direct sourcing, making it difficult to assess their accuracy fully.

Balance

The article provides perspectives from both the U.S. and China, quoting officials and analyzing their statements. However, there is a noticeable emphasis on the U.S. viewpoint, with more detailed coverage of American officials' statements and less on the Chinese perspective beyond the official statements. The article could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of China's strategic goals and challenges in the trade negotiations to provide a more balanced viewpoint.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, presenting information in a logical sequence. The language is straightforward, and the tone is neutral, which aids comprehension. However, the inclusion of specific quotes without context can disrupt the flow and make it harder for readers to understand the broader implications without additional background information.

Source quality

The article cites reputable sources such as Reuters for translations of Chinese statements, which adds credibility. However, the lack of direct links to these sources or additional corroborating reports from other news agencies slightly undermines the overall reliability of the content. The inclusion of statements from U.S. officials without specific attribution to public records or press releases also affects the perceived authority of the information.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of methodology and sourcing. While it references statements from officials, it does not provide direct links or detailed context for these statements. The lack of clarity about the basis for the claims and the absence of a clear explanation of the potential biases or interests of the sources used are areas where transparency could be improved.