Dems are ‘doomed’ if they don’t stand up to young liberals’ anti-Israel fixation, says Bill Maher

New York Post - May 10th, 2025

HBO 'Real Time' host Bill Maher criticized younger members of the Democratic Party for their failure to denounce radical Islamic terrorism while seemingly supporting anti-Israel demonstrations. Maher warned that the party might be 'doomed' if it does not distance itself from these perspectives. During his show's closing monologue, he pointed out that some young Democrats appear to show more affinity for the Palestinian cause than for the United States itself. He highlighted polling that suggests many young Democrats are not proud of their country, leading to a critical examination of their views on international issues like the situation in Gaza and support for groups like Hamas.

Maher argued that this ideological trend among young liberals could have significant repercussions for the Democratic Party's future. He emphasized the importance of understanding and appreciating American values, contrasting them with societies where freedoms are severely restricted. He criticized the party's failure to correct misconceptions about global conflicts and to challenge problematic slogans like 'Globalize the Intifada.' Maher also condemned the actions at a recent rally involving Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, where a Palestinian flag was draped over an American one, urging Democratic leaders to reaffirm their allegiance to American symbols and values. His remarks underscore a growing concern that certain progressive elements within the party may alienate broader voter bases.

Hamas Democratic Party Alexandria Ocasio Cortez Bernie Sanders Bill Maher Palestinian Cause Radical Islamic Terrorism Anti Israel Demonstrations

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article effectively captures Bill Maher's provocative commentary on the Democratic Party's internal divisions and its stance on Israel and the Middle East. While it provides a clear and engaging presentation of Maher's views, the story lacks balance and supporting evidence, which limits its overall accuracy and reliability. The reliance on a single source, coupled with the absence of diverse perspectives, reduces the article's depth and potential impact. Despite these limitations, the story addresses timely and relevant issues that are of significant public interest, making it a valuable contribution to ongoing political discussions. However, for a more comprehensive understanding, readers would benefit from additional context, data, and responses from those criticized.

Accuracy

The story presents several claims made by Bill Maher on his HBO show, which are mostly accurate based on available sources. Maher's criticism of young Democrats for not condemning radical Islamic terrorism and supporting anti-Israel demonstrations is a factual representation of his statements. However, the article lacks specific references or data to support Maher's claims about polling data showing young Democrats' embarrassment about their country. Additionally, the incident involving a Palestinian flag at a Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez rally requires verification. The story accurately quotes Maher's views on the Democratic Party's internal divisions and his comments about societal freedoms, but it should provide more evidence or citations to substantiate these claims.

Balance

The article primarily presents Bill Maher's perspective without offering counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. This lack of balance may lead to a one-sided representation of the issues discussed. While Maher's views are clearly articulated, the story would benefit from including responses or perspectives from those criticized, such as young Democrats or party leaders. Additionally, the article could explore the broader context of the Democratic Party's stance on Israel and the Middle East to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the debate.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in conveying Maher's statements and opinions. The language is straightforward, and the structure follows a logical flow, making it easy for readers to understand the main points. However, the tone is somewhat informal and opinionated, reflecting Maher's style rather than a neutral reporting voice. While this may engage readers familiar with Maher's commentary, it could detract from the article's perceived objectivity.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on Bill Maher's statements from his HBO show, which are opinion-based rather than factual reporting. There is a lack of diverse sources or expert commentary to corroborate the claims made. The story would be strengthened by including data from reputable polling organizations or statements from Democratic Party officials to provide a more rounded perspective. The reliance on a single source limits the depth and reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the basis for Maher's claims or the methodology behind the referenced polling data. There is also no information about potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect Maher's perspective. Greater transparency regarding the sources of information and the context in which Maher's statements were made would enhance the article's credibility. The lack of detailed citation or background information makes it difficult for readers to assess the validity of the claims independently.