Ex-FBI informant who made bribery story about Bidens will stay in prison, judge rules

ABC News - May 1st, 2025
Open on ABC News

A federal judge has denied the U.S. government's request to release Alexander Smirnov, a former FBI informant, from prison. Smirnov was convicted of tax evasion and lying about a fabricated bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. The decision by Judge Otis Wright, announced in Los Angeles, maintains that Smirnov poses a flight risk despite the government's motion to review the case. Smirnov's attorneys plan to appeal the decision, arguing for his release while the appeal is underway.

The case has significant political implications, as Smirnov's false claims about the Bidens accepting bribes from Burisma executives became central to a Republican-led impeachment inquiry against Biden. The allegations, initially raised during the 2020 presidential election, were dismissed by the Biden administration as a political stunt. Smirnov's original prosecutor, David Weiss, who pursued charges against Hunter Biden, resigned before Trump's second term. The ongoing legal battle highlights the intersection of politics and justice in high-profile cases involving prominent figures.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.4
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive and timely account of Alexander Smirnov's legal situation, focusing on his fabricated bribery claims involving the Bidens. It excels in accuracy and public interest by presenting well-supported facts and addressing significant political issues. The story is clear and engaging, with a logical flow that aids reader comprehension. However, it could improve in transparency by disclosing more about its sources and information-gathering process. Additionally, the article would benefit from a broader exploration of the political implications of Smirnov's claims and their impact on the impeachment inquiry. Overall, the story effectively informs and engages readers, contributing to important discussions on political integrity and misinformation.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The story accurately reports on Alexander Smirnov's legal situation, including his sentencing and charges for tax evasion and lying to the FBI about a fabricated bribery scheme involving the Bidens. The details about the denial of his release by U.S. District Judge Otis Wright and the reasoning behind it are supported by reliable sources. The timeline of events, such as Smirnov's false claims about Burisma payments and their impact on political proceedings, aligns with known facts. However, the story would benefit from additional verification of Smirnov's business dealings with Burisma and the exact nature of his interactions with the FBI.

7
Balance

The article presents a balanced view of the situation by including perspectives from both Smirnov's attorneys and the U.S. government's position. However, it could improve by providing more context on the political implications of Smirnov's claims and the broader impact on the impeachment efforts against President Biden. The story primarily focuses on the legal aspects, potentially overlooking the political motivations and consequences of the false claims.

8
Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, concise language to convey the details of Smirnov's case. The logical flow of information helps readers understand the sequence of events and the legal context. However, the story could enhance clarity by providing more background on the political climate surrounding the impeachment efforts and the significance of Smirnov's false claims.

8
Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, including statements from Smirnov's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office. It references court documents and decisions, lending authority to the reporting. However, the story could enhance its source quality by including more diverse viewpoints, such as comments from political analysts or legal experts, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the case's implications.

6
Transparency

The article provides a clear account of the legal proceedings and the charges against Smirnov, but it lacks transparency regarding the sources of some information, such as the details of Smirnov's business dealings with Burisma. The story could improve by disclosing more about its information-gathering process and any potential conflicts of interest that might affect the reporting.

Sources

  1. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/fbi-informant-made-bribery-story-bidens-stay-prison-121339531
  2. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/08/ex-fbi-informant-who-fabricated-bribery-story-00197237
  3. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/former-fbi-informant-to-plead-guilty-to-lying-about-fake-bribery-scheme-involving-the-bidens
  4. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-administration-reviewing-case-fbi-informant-convicted-lying/story?id=120718444