Here are the best AirPods deals you can get right now

The Verge - May 2nd, 2025

Apple's AirPods 4, introduced at the September event, are now available at a significant discount, matching their all-time low price of $99 across major retailers like Amazon, Walmart, and Best Buy. The AirPods 4 come in two versions: a $129 standard model and a $179 noise-canceling model, both offering notable improvements over their third-generation predecessors. Key features include a more comfortable design, enhanced audio performance, and Apple’s Voice Isolation feature for clearer call quality. The noise-canceling model provides effective noise reduction, transparency mode, wireless charging, and a case with a built-in speaker for easy tracking through the Find My app.

The ongoing discounts reflect Apple’s strategy to make high-quality audio experiences more accessible while promoting their newest audio products. The AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation, available for $148.99, bring Pro-level features to a broader audience. This pricing strategy might increase market penetration, especially among users who prioritize value and feature-rich devices. The competitive pricing of the AirPods 4, alongside the AirPods Pro and AirPods Max, showcases Apple's continued innovation in the audio space, catering to different consumer preferences and needs, while also pushing more users towards adopting their ecosystem.

Technology Discounts Apple Air Pods Wireless Earbuds

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a useful overview of current deals on Apple's AirPods, appealing to consumers interested in technology and electronics. It effectively highlights product features and pricing, making it relevant and timely for readers. However, the article's accuracy is compromised by unverified claims and a lack of clear sourcing, which diminishes its credibility. While the content is clear and engaging, the absence of broader perspectives and transparency limits its impact and public interest. Enhancing source quality and transparency would improve the article's overall quality and reliability.

Accuracy

The article presents several claims regarding the pricing and features of Apple's AirPods products. While some claims are supported by external sources, such as the pricing of the AirPods 4 with ANC at $148.99, which matches the reported best price to date, other claims, like the standard AirPods 4 being available for $99, lack verification and appear outdated or incorrect. Additionally, the article claims an all-time low price for the AirPods Pro 2 at $153.99, which is not corroborated by available data. This mix of accurate and unverifiable information suggests a need for more thorough fact-checking and source citation.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the pricing and features of various AirPods models, offering a consumer-oriented perspective. It provides a balanced view by comparing different models, such as the AirPods 4, AirPods Pro, and AirPods Max, and highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. However, the article does not explore potential drawbacks or criticisms of these products, such as their high price points or competition from other brands. Including a broader range of perspectives could enhance the article's balance.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and straightforward manner, making it accessible to a general audience. It effectively organizes information by categorizing deals for different AirPods models, which aids in reader comprehension. The language is neutral and informative, focusing on product features and pricing without unnecessary jargon. However, the inclusion of more detailed explanations about certain claims, such as the purported $99 price for the standard AirPods 4, would enhance clarity.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite sources for its claims, which undermines its credibility. While it references well-known retailers like Amazon, Walmart, and Best Buy for pricing information, it lacks direct attributions or links to these sources. This absence of clear sourcing makes it difficult to assess the reliability of the information presented, and readers cannot easily verify the claims independently. Enhancing source attribution would improve the article's credibility and trustworthiness.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in its reporting methodology and sourcing. It does not disclose how the pricing information was obtained or whether there are any potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, there is no explanation of how the featured products were selected or if there are any affiliations with the retailers mentioned. Greater transparency in these areas would provide readers with a clearer understanding of the article's basis and potential biases.