John Goodman lists his longtime New Orleans home for $5.5M in the wake of his California wildfire loss

New York Post - Mar 25th, 2025

Actor John Goodman has listed his New Orleans home for $5.5 million after the recent destruction of his Los Angeles residence in the California wildfires. The 72-year-old, known for his role in 'Roseanne,' bought the Garden District property in 2005 from musician Trent Reznor. The historic home features four bedrooms and modern upgrades like a chef’s kitchen and a saltwater pool. While it's unclear why Goodman is selling, the move could signify a shift from a city that has been his refuge from the hectic pace of Los Angeles for two decades.

Goodman and his wife, Anna Beth, have been long-time residents of New Orleans, having first moved to the city in 1989. The actor's affinity for the city dates back to a 1972 Mardi Gras visit, which left a lasting impression on him. This sale comes amid Goodman recovering from an on-set injury in the UK, halting production temporarily. As Goodman navigates these changes, his departure from New Orleans, if it occurs, would mark the end of a significant chapter in his life, reflecting both personal and professional transitions.

Hollywood Real Estate New Orleans California Wildfires John Goodman Garden District

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and engaging account of John Goodman's real estate activities and personal history with New Orleans. It scores well in clarity and readability, with a narrative that is both informative and accessible. However, the story could benefit from greater source diversity and transparency, particularly regarding the reasons behind Goodman's decisions and the status of his injury. While the article is timely and relevant to fans of Goodman and those interested in celebrity real estate, its impact and broader public interest are limited. The potential for controversy is low, as the narrative maintains a neutral tone and avoids contentious issues. Overall, the story is a well-written piece that effectively captures the reader's interest but could be strengthened by additional sources and context.

Accuracy

The story provides a detailed account of John Goodman's real estate activities and personal history with New Orleans. Most of the factual claims, such as the listing of his New Orleans home for $5.5 million, his purchase history, and the destruction of his Los Angeles home, are consistent with available public records and other sources. However, the exact date of the wildfire that destroyed his Los Angeles home and details about his on-set injury require further verification. Additionally, the article does not provide direct quotes or statements from Goodman or his representatives regarding the reason for selling the home, leaving this aspect speculative.

Balance

The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing primarily on factual reporting of John Goodman's property transactions and personal anecdotes. It provides a historical perspective on Goodman's relationship with New Orleans, which adds depth to the narrative. However, the lack of direct input from Goodman or his representatives could suggest a slight imbalance, as the reasons behind his decisions are not fully explored. Including perspectives from real estate experts or local residents could have enriched the story further.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clear, with a logical flow that guides the reader through Goodman's personal history and current real estate activities. The language is straightforward, and the narrative is engaging, making it accessible to a general audience. The use of anecdotes about Goodman's past experiences in New Orleans adds a personal touch that enhances reader engagement.

Source quality

The article references Realtor.com and mentions reaching out to Goodman's representatives, which are credible sources. However, the reliance on a single real estate source and the absence of direct quotes from Goodman or his team limit the depth of source quality. The story would benefit from a wider range of sources, such as comments from real estate experts or insights from Goodman's colleagues, to provide a more comprehensive view.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in certain areas, particularly regarding the methodology of obtaining information about Goodman's personal decisions and the current status of his injury. While it mentions reaching out to Goodman's representatives, it does not disclose whether they responded or if any attempts were made to verify claims about his injury and future plans. Greater transparency about these efforts would enhance the article's credibility.