Microsoft reveals its rejected Start menu redesigns

The Verge - May 13th, 2025

Microsoft is unveiling a redesign of the Start menu in Windows 11, introducing a wider design and the ability to disable the recommended feed of files and apps. This update is based on extensive testing, including eye-tracking and feedback from over 300 Windows 11 fans. The redesign focuses on ease of access, customization, and maintaining familiarity with the traditional Start menu layout. Additionally, the new design incorporates a phone companion panel for quick access to recent calls, messages, and phone files, enhancing user interaction with the Start menu.

The context behind this redesign demonstrates Microsoft's efforts to innovate while respecting the long-standing interface familiarity that users have developed over three decades. The design team explored various prototypes, including concepts featuring widget-like functionality and vertical scrolling sections, before finalizing the current iteration. By enabling customization and removing unnecessary recommendations, Microsoft aims to improve user experience. The new Start menu is currently in testing with Windows Insiders and is expected to roll out to all Windows 11 users in the coming months.

Microsoft Windows 11 Software Update User Interface Start Menu Redesign

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and accurate overview of Microsoft's redesign of the Windows 11 Start menu, highlighting both the new features and the design process. It is well-supported by credible sources, primarily Microsoft's own materials, and is timely given the ongoing testing phase. While the article is informative and accessible, it could benefit from a more balanced perspective by including independent expert opinions or user feedback. The readability and clarity of the article are strong, making it suitable for a broad audience. However, the lack of diverse viewpoints and potential for controversy limits its engagement and impact. Overall, the article effectively informs readers about a relevant technological development with room for deeper exploration of user experiences and expert analyses.

Accuracy

The article accurately describes Microsoft's efforts to redesign the Windows 11 Start menu, including specific features such as the ability to disable the recommended feed and the wider design. The details about Microsoft's design process and the various concept designs considered are well-supported by sources like Microsoft's blog post and other tech news outlets. However, the article could benefit from more precise information about the timeline for the rollout to all users, which remains somewhat vague. Overall, the factual claims are consistent with available information, but some aspects, like user feedback on the new design, require further verification.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view of the Start menu redesign by discussing both the final design and the rejected concepts. It highlights the design team's efforts to respect user habits while introducing new features. However, the article primarily focuses on Microsoft's perspective and lacks input from independent experts or user testimonials, which could provide a more rounded view of the redesign's impact on users.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, concise language to explain the changes to the Windows 11 Start menu. It logically presents the information, starting with the new features and then discussing the design process and rejected concepts. The tone is neutral and informative, making the content accessible to a general audience. The use of specific examples and direct quotes from the design team enhances comprehension.

Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, including Microsoft's official blog and images, to support its claims about the Start menu redesign. These sources are authoritative and directly involved in the subject matter. However, the article could enhance its reliability by incorporating insights from independent tech analysts or user feedback to provide a more comprehensive view of the changes and their reception.

Transparency

The article is transparent about the sources of information, primarily citing Microsoft's own materials and statements from the design team. It clearly outlines the basis for its claims and provides context for the redesign process. However, the article does not discuss any potential biases or conflicts of interest, such as Microsoft's motivation to promote its new design, which could affect the impartiality of the presentation.