Neighbor caught on security camera doing this ‘disgusting’ act on driveway

New York Post - May 6th, 2025

A shocking incident in South Australia has gained attention after a resident discovered a neighbor defecating on their driveway via home security footage. On April 26, 2025, the homeowner logged into their security system, only to find that a woman walking her dog had relieved herself on their property. The resident responded by putting up a sign demanding the woman clean up her mess within 48 hours, threatening to release the footage if she failed to comply. This unusual neighborhood drama quickly captured the interest of the online community, sparking discussions and jokes on platforms like Reddit.

This incident highlights a broader issue of public defecation emergencies, which have become increasingly common in recent years. Known as "poo joggers," individuals relieving themselves in public have been reported in various Australian suburbs since 2018. The ongoing trend, exacerbated by the lack of public restrooms during the COVID pandemic, underscores a social dilemma concerning public decency and privacy, as well as the role of surveillance in community accountability.

Home Security Public Defecation South Australia Neighbor Dispute Viral Incident

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents an intriguing and unusual incident with a clear and engaging narrative. It effectively captures reader interest through its novelty and the inclusion of social media reactions. However, the story's depth is limited by its reliance on anecdotal evidence and lack of authoritative sources. While it touches on broader issues of public hygiene and privacy, it doesn't explore these themes in detail. Greater balance and transparency in sourcing, along with more diverse perspectives, would enhance the article's credibility and public interest relevance. The story serves as a curiosity piece with potential for sparking discussion but lacks the depth needed for significant impact.

Accuracy

The story presents a factual account of an unusual incident where a woman allegedly defecated on a neighbor's driveway in South Australia. The main claims, such as the date, location, and the homeowner's response, are consistently supported by multiple sources. However, some elements, like the exact legal implications and the broader claim of increasing public defecation incidents, lack concrete statistical backing. While the story accurately reports the event, it could benefit from additional verification, especially regarding legal aspects and the broader context of similar incidents.

Balance

The story focuses predominantly on the perspective of the homeowner and the shock of the incident, with little to no exploration of the alleged perpetrator's side. While the homeowner's actions and community reactions are well-documented, the lack of the woman's perspective or potential reasons for her actions presents a somewhat one-sided narrative. Including more diverse viewpoints, such as expert opinions on public defecation or potential underlying issues, could provide a more balanced account.

Clarity

The article is written in a straightforward and engaging manner, making it easy to follow. The structure is logical, with a clear progression from the incident description to community reactions. The language is simple and accessible, though some sensationalist elements could be toned down for a more neutral tone. Overall, the article effectively communicates the key points of the story.

Source quality

The article relies on anecdotal evidence and social media reactions, which can be unreliable. There is no indication of direct interviews or quotes from involved parties, such as the homeowner or local authorities. The lack of authoritative sources, like police reports or legal experts, diminishes the article's reliability. Incorporating more verified and authoritative sources would enhance the credibility of the reporting.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative of the incident but lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. There is no disclosure of how the information was gathered or verified, and the absence of direct citations or links to primary sources leaves readers without a clear understanding of the basis for certain claims. Greater transparency in sourcing and methodology would improve the article's credibility.