'New Ivies’ schools named by Forbes. Did any Indiana universities make the list?

Yahoo! News - Apr 28th, 2025

A recent Forbes survey reveals a notable decline in the favorability of Ivy League graduates among top-level executives across the United States. The survey, which included responses from over 380 executives, found that 37% of respondents were less inclined to hire Ivy League graduates compared to five years ago, an increase from 33% in the previous year. Additionally, 12% of the executives expressed a complete unwillingness to hire graduates from these prestigious institutions. In response to these trends, Forbes has highlighted its 'New Ivies,' a list of 10 public and 10 private colleges and universities that are gaining recognition for attracting promising future professionals.

This shift away from traditional Ivy League schools reflects a broader trend of diversification in the educational landscape, where institutions outside the historical elite are gaining prominence. The 'New Ivies' list provides an alternative pathway for students and parents seeking quality education and professional opportunities. Notably, two Indiana schools have made the 2025 Forbes list, showcasing the growing importance of regional institutions. The implications of this trend suggest a potential reshaping of hiring practices and educational priorities in the U.S., where merit and skills may increasingly outweigh traditional prestige.

Ivy League Higher Education Forbes Survey Employment Trends New Ivies Indiana Schools

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides an interesting perspective on the changing perceptions of Ivy League schools and the emergence of 'New Ivies.' It is timely and addresses a topic of public interest, potentially influencing opinions about higher education choices. However, the article's lack of methodological transparency and reliance on a single source limit its accuracy and depth. While the language is clear and accessible, the absence of diverse perspectives and detailed information detracts from its balance and engagement potential. Overall, the article raises relevant questions but would benefit from more comprehensive reporting to enhance its impact and reliability.

Accuracy

The article makes several claims about the changing perceptions of Ivy League schools among top-level executives and introduces the concept of 'New Ivies' as identified by Forbes. The factual accuracy of these claims hinges on the survey data from Forbes, which reportedly shows a decline in preference for Ivy League graduates. However, the article does not provide detailed information about the survey's methodology or sample size, which are crucial for verifying the accuracy of the claims. Additionally, while the article mentions two Indiana schools being on the 2025 Forbes list, it does not specify which ones, leaving a gap in information that could be verified with additional sources.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the perspective that Ivy League schools are losing favor among employers, as evidenced by the Forbes survey. It does not provide counterarguments or alternative perspectives, such as the potential reasons why Ivy League graduates might still be highly valued or any response from the Ivy League institutions themselves. This lack of balance suggests a potential bias towards the narrative of declining Ivy League prestige without fully exploring the broader context or differing viewpoints.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, presenting its main points without excessive jargon or complexity. However, the structure could be improved by providing more detailed explanations of the survey results and the selection process for the 'New Ivies.' The lack of specific examples, such as the names of the Indiana schools on the list, detracts from the clarity and completeness of the information presented.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on data from Forbes, a reputable source known for its business and educational rankings. However, it does not cite any additional sources or experts to corroborate the claims made about employer preferences or to provide context on the 'New Ivies' selection process. The reliance on a single source limits the depth and reliability of the reporting, although Forbes' credibility does lend some authority to the claims presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in explaining the methodology behind the Forbes survey and the criteria for selecting the 'New Ivies.' It does not clarify how the survey was conducted, who the respondents were, or what specific metrics were used to identify the new schools. This lack of methodological transparency makes it difficult for readers to fully understand the basis of the claims and assess their validity.