The article accurately reports on the legislative proposal in New Hampshire to allocate electoral votes by congressional district. It provides specific details about Senate Bill 11 and quotes key political figures, such as Republican State Sen. Bill Gannon and Democratic State Sen. Debra Altschiller. However, the article could benefit from more data or studies that discuss the impact of similar systems in Maine and Nebraska. The claim that the proposed system would give 'more power to the voters' is presented as fact, but lacks empirical evidence or expert analysis to substantiate it. While the quotes are attributed accurately, the article could enhance its accuracy by incorporating more statistical data or expert opinions on the potential effects of the proposed changes.

The article presents perspectives from both Republican and Democratic state senators, providing a basic level of balance. However, the coverage appears to favor the Republican viewpoint, as evidenced by the more extensive quotes and justifications from Sen. Gannon. While it briefly mentions Democratic opposition through Sen. Altschiller's comments, it doesn't delve deeply into the Democratic rationale or broader public opinion on the issue. The article could improve its balance by including more voices from the Democratic side, independent experts, and possibly public opinions to provide a fuller spectrum of perspectives. Furthermore, the article does not sufficiently address the criticism of gerrymandering, which is a significant point of contention in electoral reforms.

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the proposed electoral changes and the political context in New Hampshire. The language is straightforward, and the tone remains mostly neutral, though it occasionally leans slightly towards a Republican perspective. Complex electoral concepts are explained adequately, but the article could be improved by breaking down the implications of the proposed changes more thoroughly for readers unfamiliar with electoral systems. Additionally, while quotes from political figures are helpful, the article could provide more background information to contextualize these statements better.

The article primarily relies on quotes from political figures and internal sources like Fox News Digital. While these sources provide direct insights into the political motivations behind the bill, the article lacks input from external experts or political analysts who could offer an unbiased view of the potential implications. The reliance on a single news outlet and lack of third-party verification or diverse sourcing slightly undermine the credibility and depth of the article. To enhance source quality, the article should incorporate studies, expert analyses, or interviews with political scientists, which would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the electoral system changes and their potential consequences.

The article is transparent in disclosing the political affiliations of the individuals quoted and provides context about the current electoral system and its historical significance in New Hampshire. However, it could improve by explaining the methodology or data supporting the claims about voter empowerment and the potential impact of the proposed changes. The article does not address any potential conflicts of interest, such as the political motivations behind the bill, which could affect its impartiality. Additionally, more background on how the current electoral system operates and comparisons with other states would provide readers with a clearer understanding of the issue.