Ohio deputy fatally struck by man whose son had been shot by police: Authorities

ABC News - May 4th, 2025

In Ohio, Rodney Hinton Jr. has been charged with aggravated murder for allegedly striking and killing a sheriff's deputy with his car. This incident occurred a day after Hinton's 18-year-old son, Ryan Hinton, was fatally shot by police. The deputy was hit while directing traffic near the University of Cincinnati. Prosecutors argue that Hinton's actions were intentional and premeditated, citing his deliberate acceleration towards the deputy. Hinton is being held without bond, with his next court appearance scheduled for May 6.

The case has generated significant emotional responses within the community, particularly given the recent death of Hinton's son. The Hinton family, represented by The Cochran Firm and Pierson and Pierson, LLC, is investigating Ryan's death, having viewed body camera footage of the shooting. The incident highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement and the community, as well as the profound grief experienced by both the Hinton family and the family of the deceased deputy, whose identity remains protected under Ohio law.

Ohio Cincinnati Police Police Shooting Rodney Hinton Jr. Ryan Hinton Sheriff's Deputy Aggravated Murder The Cochran Firm Pierson And Pierson, Llc

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely account of a tragic series of events involving the Hinton family and law enforcement. It presents multiple perspectives, including those of the prosecution, defense, and the family, though it could benefit from more balanced exploration of these viewpoints. The reporting is generally accurate, but some claims, such as the premeditated nature of the incident, require further verification. The story is well-structured and readable, engaging readers with its dramatic narrative while maintaining a neutral tone. Overall, the article effectively informs the public about a significant and sensitive issue, though it could be strengthened by additional context and independent sources.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on the charges against Rodney Hinton Jr. for the alleged murder of a sheriff's deputy, as well as the connection to his son's shooting by police. The details about the court appearance and the family's statement are consistent with factual reporting. However, the claim that Hinton Jr. 'purposely' struck the deputy requires further verification, as it hinges on evidence not fully detailed in the article. The article's mention of the deputy's identity being protected under Ohio law is accurate, but the lack of specific details about the deputy's identity and service status limits the ability to fully verify these claims.

Balance

The article presents multiple perspectives, including statements from the prosecuting attorney, Hinton Jr.'s defense attorney, and the Hinton family. However, it leans towards the prosecution's narrative by emphasizing the 'calculated and premeditated' nature of Hinton Jr.'s actions without equally exploring the defense's arguments or presenting more context about Hinton Jr.'s state of mind. The family's perspective is included, but the article could benefit from more detailed exploration of their viewpoint regarding the events leading up to the incident.

Clarity

The language and structure of the article are clear and straightforward, making it easy to follow the sequence of events. The story is logically organized, starting with the charges against Hinton Jr. and providing background on his son's death. The tone remains neutral, although more clarity could be provided regarding the evidence supporting the claims of premeditation. Overall, the article is comprehensible and well-structured.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, such as the prosecuting attorney and the attorneys representing the Hinton family. It also references ABC Cincinnati affiliate WCPO, which adds to the story's credibility. However, the reliance on statements from involved parties means the article could benefit from additional independent sources or expert commentary to provide a more rounded view of the situation.

Transparency

The article provides some context for the events, such as the connection between the two incidents involving the Hinton family. It discloses the involvement of attorneys and the legal proceedings, but lacks detailed explanation of the evidence supporting the claims of premeditation. The article does not sufficiently explain the basis for the prosecuting attorney's assertions, which affects the transparency of the reporting.