‘Quordle’ Today: Hints And Answers For Monday, March 24

Forbes - Mar 23rd, 2025

The popular online puzzle game Quordle has released hints and answers for today's challenge, featuring four five-letter words: FLOUT, SMASH, RAZOR, and SMALL. Players are given nine attempts to guess all four words, with hints provided to guide them. The game requires players to guess all words simultaneously, with correct letters lighting up in green and misplaced letters appearing in yellow. Today's hints describe the words as 'treat with contempt,' 'a big success,' 'sharp instrument,' and 'not big.'

Quordle has gained a substantial following due to its engaging format and daily challenges, similar to the viral success of Wordle. By providing hints and solutions, the game ensures that both new and seasoned players can enjoy the puzzle, fostering a sense of community and shared achievement. The game's daily nature and interactive format continue to attract players looking for a quick yet stimulating mental exercise, further solidifying its place in the growing landscape of online word games.

Puzzle Game Quordle Hints And Answers Daily Challenge Word Game

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a clear and timely update for Quordle players seeking daily hints and answers. It excels in clarity and readability, making it accessible to its target audience. However, it lacks transparency in sourcing the answers and does not provide a broader context or diverse perspectives. The piece is primarily of interest to Quordle players, with limited public interest or impact beyond this niche. While mostly accurate, a minor factual inconsistency regarding repeated letters slightly affects its precision. Overall, the article effectively serves its purpose for a specific audience but could benefit from greater transparency and broader engagement.

Accuracy

The article provides a generally accurate overview of the game Quordle, including the gameplay mechanics and the specific words for the day. The factual claims about the game's rules are consistent with known gameplay mechanics, such as the need to guess four five-letter words with nine attempts. However, there is a discrepancy regarding the claim that three of the words contain repeated letters, which does not match the words provided: FLOUT, SMASH, RAZOR, and SMALL. This inconsistency slightly undermines the article's precision. Overall, the article is mostly truthful but contains a minor inaccuracy that could confuse readers.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on providing hints and answers for the Quordle game, without exploring different perspectives or opinions. It lacks a broader context or discussion about the game's impact or popularity. The piece could benefit from including perspectives on why players enjoy Quordle or how it compares to similar games like Wordle. The lack of diverse viewpoints results in a somewhat narrow presentation focused solely on gameplay assistance.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and straightforward manner, effectively communicating the game's rules and the day's answers. The language is simple and accessible, making it easy for readers to understand the content. The structure is logical, with a natural progression from gameplay explanation to hints and answers. The tone is neutral and informative, contributing to a pleasant reading experience.

Source quality

The article does not cite any sources or references to support its claims about the game and the answers provided. While the information about Quordle's gameplay is generally known, the lack of attribution for the daily answers raises questions about the credibility of the source. Including references to the official Quordle website or other authoritative sources would enhance the reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding its sources and methodology for obtaining the daily Quordle answers. There is no disclosure of how the answers were obtained or whether there are any affiliations with the game's creators. This omission makes it difficult for readers to assess the reliability of the information. Providing background on the source of the answers and any potential conflicts of interest would improve transparency.