REAL ID requirements to fly in US take effect

Apnews - May 7th, 2025

The implementation of REAL ID requirements for domestic flights within the United States begins after nearly two decades of delays. As the deadline approaches, individuals across the country are rushing to obtain their compliant IDs. In response, many state offices have extended hours, and special centers like the Real ID Supercenter in Chicago have been established to accommodate the increased demand. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reassured travelers that those without a REAL ID can still fly by undergoing additional identity checks, though many voiced frustration over long wait times and the need to take time off work.

The REAL ID initiative, a recommendation from the 9/11 Commission, aims to enhance security by ensuring that travelers are who they claim to be. Originally signed into law in 2005, its rollout was delayed several times. While 81% of travelers reportedly already possess REAL IDs, confusion persists about the requirements. The Transportation Security Administration advises passengers without a REAL ID to allow extra time for security checks. Besides air travel, REAL ID will also be necessary for accessing certain federal buildings, highlighting its broader implications for identification and security protocols in the U.S.

Kristi Noem Homeland Security Tsa Real Id Domestic Flights Travel Security 9/11 Commission

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant overview of the upcoming REAL ID requirements, effectively communicating the key points and implications for travelers. It scores well in terms of accuracy, timeliness, and public interest, as it addresses a topic that affects a large number of people and is set to take effect soon. The inclusion of perspectives from both government officials and the public adds balance and depth to the coverage. However, the article could improve in areas such as source quality and transparency by providing more detailed data and explanations of the methodology behind certain claims. Additionally, the article could enhance engagement and controversy by exploring differing opinions on the necessity and effectiveness of the REAL ID program. Overall, the article is a reliable and informative resource for readers seeking to understand the changes in domestic travel identification requirements.

Accuracy

The article generally maintains factual accuracy regarding the implementation of REAL ID requirements, the history of delays, and the procedures for travelers without a REAL ID. The claim that REAL ID requirements are set to begin after nearly 20 years of delays is accurate, reflecting the timeline since the law's inception in 2005. The article accurately describes the alternative forms of identification accepted at TSA checkpoints, such as passports and tribal IDs. However, the article could improve by providing more specific data or sources to support the claim that 81% of travelers already have REAL IDs. Overall, the story is largely accurate but could benefit from more precise data points and source citations.

Balance

The article presents a relatively balanced view of the situation by including perspectives from both government officials and the public. It features comments from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and TSA officials, as well as individuals like Marion Henderson and Michael Aceto, who express frustration with the process. However, the article could provide more depth by including perspectives from a broader range of stakeholders, such as airline representatives or security experts, to offer a more comprehensive view of the potential impacts of the REAL ID requirements.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly communicates the key points regarding the REAL ID requirements and their implications for travelers. The language is straightforward, and the inclusion of quotes from various stakeholders adds depth and context. However, the article could improve clarity by providing more detailed explanations of the REAL ID process and the specific steps travelers need to take to comply, which would help readers better understand the practical implications.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including statements from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and TSA officials, which enhances its reliability. However, it lacks direct references to specific studies, reports, or external data that could further substantiate its claims. The inclusion of more diverse sources, such as academic experts or independent analysts, would improve the article's credibility and provide a more nuanced understanding of the REAL ID implementation.

Transparency

The article provides a clear overview of the REAL ID requirements and the associated timeline, but it lacks transparency regarding the sources of some of its claims, such as the percentage of travelers with REAL IDs. Additionally, the article could benefit from more explicit explanations of the methodology behind the data presented, such as how the 81% figure was calculated. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the article's credibility and allow readers to better assess the validity of the information.