Sacramento to begin search for a new city manager next year

The city of Sacramento will begin searching for a new city manager next year after the city council voted 6 to 3 against extending the current city manager Chan's contract. Chan's tenure will end on December 31, 2023, after serving since 2017. His nearly $400,000 salary and contract conditions, which included a provision for up to $1,000,000, were points of contention amid a city budget deficit. Council members Eric Guerra and Lisa Kaplan had differing views on extending Chan's contract, with Guerra citing financial concerns and Kaplan emphasizing the need for experienced leadership. New mayor Kevin McCarty, who initially supported an extension, ultimately voted against it, indicating the need for change. The city plans to involve the community in selecting new leadership and may consider candidates from outside the state.
RATING
The article provides a clear and detailed account of the situation regarding the Sacramento city manager's contract extension. While it offers factual information and presents different perspectives, there is a lack of explicit citation of sources, which affects source quality. The narrative is balanced and transparent, though it could benefit from more detailed attribution.
RATING DETAILS
The article appears to be factually accurate, with specific details about the vote, salaries, and statements from involved parties. However, it does not provide external references or sources to verify the claims.
Multiple viewpoints are presented, including those from council members Eric Guerra and Lisa Kaplan, as well as Mayor Kevin McCarty. This suggests a balanced representation of perspectives on the issue.
The language is clear, neutral, and free from emotive terms. The article is logically structured, detailing the sequence of events and the positions of various stakeholders.
The article does not explicitly cite sources beyond general references to a 'city spokesperson' and 'KCRA 3 News.' More authoritative and direct citations would enhance the credibility of the reporting.
The article is transparent about the decision-making process and the reasons behind the rejection of the contract extension. However, it could further disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations of the council members involved.