Sony considers PS5 price hikes to cover Trump’s tariffs

The Verge - May 14th, 2025

Sony is facing a significant financial impact due to tariffs, estimated at 100 billion yen, or about $680 million. To address this, the company is considering options such as relocating manufacturing to the United States and potentially increasing product prices, including the PS5. During an earnings call, Sony CFO Lin Tao mentioned the possibility of passing the tariff costs on to consumers. Although the PS5 wasn't specifically named, CEO Hiroki Totoki highlighted the console as a candidate for US-based production to circumvent tariffs. Sony had already increased PS5 prices in select markets earlier this year, and further hikes could be on the horizon depending on how the company decides to manage the tariff impact.

The potential price increases for the PS5 come at a time when Sony's console shipments have slightly decreased, reaching 18.5 million units over the past year. The tariffs primarily affect goods manufactured in China, where most PS5 units are produced, putting Sony's gaming business at risk. The US tariffs on imports from China are significantly higher than those from other countries, and gaming consoles have not been exempted. While competitors like Microsoft have already raised prices, Nintendo has held steady on its pricing plans for the upcoming Switch 2. Sony's decision on pricing could be influenced by upcoming product announcements, such as the WH-1000XM6 headphones, which may provide further insights into the company's strategy.

Ps5 Manufacturing Tariffs Sony Trade Policy Price Increase Hiroki Totoki Lin Tao

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively covers a timely and relevant topic, providing insights into Sony's strategic considerations in response to tariffs. It is largely accurate, supported by credible sources, and written in a clear, accessible manner. However, it could benefit from greater transparency in distinguishing between confirmed facts and speculation, as well as a broader range of perspectives to enhance balance and engagement. While the potential for controversy exists, particularly regarding consumer reactions to price changes, the article does not explore these aspects in depth. Overall, it serves as a useful piece for readers interested in the intersection of gaming, economics, and international trade.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate, with most claims supported by reputable sources. For instance, Sony's expected tariff impact of 100 billion yen and the consideration of passing these costs to consumers are verified by multiple outlets, including GSMArena and IGN. However, the claim about the PS5 Pro's potential price increase is speculative, as Sony has not officially announced this model. Additionally, while the story mentions Sony's manufacturing strategies and potential price adjustments, it does not provide specific figures or timelines, which leaves some details unverified.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view of Sony's potential strategies to mitigate tariff impacts, including price hikes and manufacturing relocation. However, it primarily focuses on Sony's perspective, with limited discussion on consumer or industry reactions. The piece could benefit from including viewpoints from economists or industry analysts to provide a more rounded perspective on the implications of Sony's potential actions.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. However, the inclusion of speculative statements without clear labeling can cause confusion. Clarifying which parts of the story are based on confirmed information versus speculation would improve overall clarity and comprehension for the reader.

Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, such as statements from Sony executives and financial reports, which enhance its reliability. However, the story could improve by citing a wider range of sources, including independent analysts or industry experts, to provide additional context and verification of the claims made.

Transparency

The article does not fully disclose the basis for some of its speculative claims, such as the potential price increase of the PS5 Pro. It could improve transparency by clearly distinguishing between confirmed facts and industry speculation. Additionally, more context on the methodology used to estimate the financial impact of tariffs would enhance readers' understanding of the situation.