The Apple Watch Series 10 is $100 off for the Amazon Spring Sale

Engadget - Mar 25th, 2025

In a major highlight of the Amazon Spring Sale, the Apple Watch Series 10 is now available at a record-low price of $299, offering a $100 discount from its usual retail price. The Apple Watch SE also sees a significant price cut, available for $169, down from $249. The Series 10, praised for its larger screen and sleek design, is touted as the best smartwatch overall, particularly appealing for newcomers or those upgrading from older models. However, features like the blood oxygen sensor are missing, and the sleep apnea detection is available in previous models as well.

The sale provides a great opportunity for consumers seeking to purchase Apple devices at a reduced cost, emphasizing the competitive nature of tech sales. While the deals are attractive, the Series 10's lack of significant innovations compared to its predecessors may not justify an upgrade for those already owning Series 8 or 9. Nonetheless, for new buyers or those with older models, this sale could be an ideal chance to future-proof their smartwatch collection, highlighting the ongoing competition and strategies in the tech retail market.

Apple Watch Series 10 Amazon Spring Sale Smartwatch Discounts Apple Devices Tech Sales

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely overview of discounts on Apple Watches during the Amazon Spring Sale, making it relevant for consumers interested in tech deals. It accurately presents pricing information, although it could benefit from more explicit sourcing and transparency regarding where this information originates. The article's focus on Apple products may limit its balance and impact, as it does not explore alternative options or broader market trends. Enhancing source quality, transparency, and balance could improve the article's credibility and engagement. Overall, the article serves its purpose of informing readers about current deals but could be strengthened by providing a more comprehensive view of the smartwatch market.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports the price drop of the Apple Watch Series 10 to $299, noting it as a significant discount from its previous price of $399. This aligns with the current market offerings. However, the claim that this is the lowest price ever needs verification against historical pricing data. Additionally, the story mentions the sleep apnea detection feature being available on other models, which should be cross-referenced with Apple's official specifications. The article's assertion about the review score of 90 for the Apple Watch Series 10 is also factual, yet it lacks a direct citation to the review source, which would strengthen its credibility.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the benefits and features of the Apple Watch Series 10, which could lead to a perception of bias towards Apple's products. It does mention some drawbacks, such as the lack of the blood oxygen feature, but these are not explored in depth. The story could be more balanced by discussing alternative smartwatch options or providing a broader context about the smartwatch market. This would offer readers a more comprehensive view and help them make informed purchasing decisions.

Clarity

The language and structure of the article are clear and straightforward, making it easy for readers to understand the main points. The use of bullet points for pricing information aids in quick comprehension. However, the article could improve by organizing the information more logically, perhaps by grouping related features and comparisons together. This would enhance the overall flow and coherence of the narrative.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite its sources, which affects the perceived reliability of the information. While the pricing details are likely sourced from major retailers, the lack of direct attribution makes it difficult to assess the credibility of the claims. Including references to official retailer announcements or reviews from reputable tech sites would enhance the article's authority and trustworthiness.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. It does not disclose where the pricing information or review score was obtained, which could lead readers to question the basis of these claims. Additionally, there is no discussion of potential conflicts of interest or the author's relationship with Apple, which is crucial for maintaining impartiality. Greater transparency would involve clear citation of sources and acknowledgment of any affiliations.