These 4 types of cancer have spiked for people under 50 — who’s more at risk

New York Post - May 8th, 2025

A groundbreaking study published in Cancer Discovery reports a significant rise in early-onset cancers among young adults, particularly in breast, colorectal, kidney, and uterine cancers, which have seen an 80% increase from 2010 to 2019. Led by Meredith Shiels from the National Cancer Institute, the study analyzed over two million cases and found that 63% of these cancers occurred in women, with increasing mortality in colorectal, uterine, and testicular cancers. The research highlights the need for improved cancer prevention and early detection strategies, prompting changes in screening recommendations, such as lowering the age for breast and colorectal cancer screenings.

The study points to rising obesity rates and changes in reproductive patterns as potential contributors to the increase in early-onset cancers. Additionally, a global study attributes the rise to westernized diets and poor exercise habits. In response, the US has adjusted screening guidelines, recommending earlier colon cancer screenings. This trend underscores the importance of awareness and early detection, especially for younger populations who might not perceive themselves at risk. The findings aim to inform future public health strategies and mitigate the growing incidence of these cancers.

Obesity Early Onset Cancers Meredith Shiels National Cancer Institute Cancer Discovery Breast Cancer Colorectal Cancer Cancer Screening

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the rise in early-onset cancers, supported by credible sources and recent studies. It effectively communicates the significance of the issue, highlighting both the increase in incidence and the potential contributing factors. While it excels in accuracy and public interest, it could benefit from enhanced transparency regarding study methodologies and a broader exploration of differing viewpoints. Overall, the article is timely, relevant, and well-structured, offering valuable insights into a pressing public health concern.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports on the rise of early-onset cancers, citing a significant study published in a reputable journal, Cancer Discovery. It mentions specific cancers such as breast, colorectal, kidney, and uterine, which aligns with current epidemiological data. The reported 80% increase in these cancers from 2010 to 2019 is consistent with documented trends. The article's mention of Meredith Shiels from the National Cancer Institute adds credibility, as she is a recognized authority in cancer research. However, the claim regarding a global study attributing the rise to westernized diets and lifestyle factors, while plausible, would benefit from direct citation of the study for full verification.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by discussing both the increase in cancer incidence and the unchanged death rates for most cancers. It highlights potential causes such as obesity and lifestyle factors, offering a broad perspective on the issue. However, the article could improve balance by including more viewpoints or counterarguments about other potential causes or by discussing the limitations of the study in more detail.

Clarity

The article is clearly written, with a logical flow and an easy-to-understand presentation of information. It uses straightforward language and a neutral tone, making it accessible to a general audience. However, some complex topics, such as the specific mechanisms by which lifestyle factors influence cancer risk, could be explained in more detail to enhance reader comprehension.

Source quality

The article cites reliable sources, including a study from the journal Cancer Discovery and comments from a senior investigator at the National Cancer Institute. These sources are credible and authoritative in the field of cancer research. However, the article could enhance source quality by providing more detailed references or links to the studies mentioned, allowing readers to verify the information independently.

Transparency

While the article is transparent about the study's findings and the expert opinions included, it lacks detailed information about the methodology of the study. Providing more context on how the data was collected and analyzed would improve transparency. Additionally, disclosing any potential conflicts of interest or funding sources for the study would further enhance the article's transparency.