Today’s ‘Wordle’ #1396 Hints, Clues And Answer For Tuesday, April 15th

Forbes - Apr 15th, 2025

In today's Wordle challenge, players are given hints and clues to solve the puzzle word, which is 'ASHEN'. This five-letter word puzzle game has become a daily ritual for many, who not only attempt to solve it but also compete against the Wordle Bot. In this round, the player Erik solves the puzzle in three guesses, matching the performance of the Wordle Bot. The game encourages maintaining a score tally, adding a competitive edge to the fun, with points awarded based on the number of guesses and performance against the Bot.

Wordle has grown into a popular pastime, engaging users with its simple yet addictive format. This particular session highlights the strategic thinking involved in word selection and the thrill of competition. As the game approaches Wordle #1400, players and enthusiasts speculate on potential future developments, such as expanding the challenge to six-letter words. The cultural phenomenon of Wordle underscores the blend of language, strategy, and online interaction, offering insights into digital gaming trends and community engagement.

Wordle Wordle Bot Puzzle Game Online Competition Daily Puzzle Erik Language Game

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides accurate and timely information about the daily Wordle puzzle, offering hints and solutions that align with external sources. It engages readers with a conversational tone and personal anecdotes but lacks depth in terms of source quality and public interest. The speculative elements about Wordle's future are not well-supported, and while the article is clear and readable, it does not address broader societal issues. Overall, it serves its purpose as an entertaining and informative piece for Wordle enthusiasts, with limited impact beyond this niche audience.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports the Wordle answer for the day, **ASHEN**, and provides correct hints about the word's characteristics, such as starting with a vowel and referring to a pale gray color. These details align with multiple external sources, confirming their truthfulness. The etymology of "ashen" is also accurately described, matching historical linguistic sources. However, speculative statements about the future of Wordle, such as evolving into a 6-letter game, are subjective and not verifiable facts. Overall, the factual content is well-supported, though the speculative elements require clarification.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on providing hints and solutions for the Wordle game, with a light-hearted tone. It does not delve into broader perspectives or controversies, as it is centered around a daily puzzle. The inclusion of personal anecdotes from the author adds a subjective viewpoint, but this is consistent with the article's informal and entertainment-driven purpose. While it doesn't provide a broad range of perspectives, the article's scope and intent do not necessitate such balance.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear, engaging style that is easy to follow. The structure is logical, with a straightforward presentation of hints, solutions, and personal anecdotes. The language is accessible, catering to a general audience interested in Wordle. However, the inclusion of speculative content without clear separation from factual information could confuse some readers regarding the article's intent.

Source quality

The article relies on the author's personal experience and use of Wordle Bot for analysis, which limits the variety of sources. There is no attribution to external authoritative sources, which could enhance credibility. The reliance on personal anecdotes and informal scoring systems suggests a casual approach to source quality. While the article serves its purpose for entertainment, the lack of diverse or authoritative sources may affect its perceived reliability.

Transparency

The article is transparent about its purpose, focusing on Wordle hints and solutions, and clearly discloses the author's methodology for scoring and analysis. However, it lacks detailed explanation of how Wordle Bot functions or the basis for the scoring system, which may leave readers unclear about these processes. The speculative commentary on Wordle's future lacks transparency regarding its basis or evidence.