Trump revokes former US DHS Secretary Maryorkas’ Secret Service protection

Fox News - Mar 25th, 2025

In a significant shift in security protocols, President Donald Trump has revoked Secret Service protection for former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and President Joe Biden's adult children, Hunter and Ashley Biden. This decision follows a recent announcement by Trump on Truth Social, where he criticized the extended protective details assigned to the Biden family, citing unnecessary resource allocation. The revocation of protection for Mayorkas was confirmed via an executive memorandum and marks a notable policy shift under Trump’s administration.

The move comes as Sean Curran is sworn in as the new director of the Secret Service, a position appointed by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The changes highlight a broader reevaluation of security provisions for former government officials and their families. This development is set against a backdrop of ongoing legal challenges involving Mayorkas and Hunter Biden, with the former facing a lawsuit from Louisiana over a public health incident. The implications of these actions underscore a potential redefinition of security priorities, with possible political and operational ramifications for the Secret Service.

Donald Trump Hunter Biden Kristi Noem Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Secret Service Ashley Biden Sean Curran Security Protection

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article presents a timely and engaging story about the revocation of Secret Service protection for former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and the Biden children by former President Donald Trump. It covers topics of significant public interest and has the potential to influence public opinion and provoke debate. However, the article lacks balance, as it primarily focuses on Trump's actions without providing perspectives from those affected. The reliance on a single news outlet limits source diversity, and the story could benefit from greater transparency and verification of key claims. Overall, while the article is clear and accessible, it would be strengthened by incorporating additional perspectives and more thorough verification of the facts presented.

Accuracy

The story claims that President Donald Trump revoked Secret Service protection for former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and former President Biden's children, Hunter and Ashley. These claims need verification regarding the executive memorandum's details and legal basis. The story mentions specific numbers of agents assigned to the Biden children, which requires confirmation. The legal framework for Secret Service protection is referenced, but further clarification on the provisions allowing extensions is necessary. Overall, the story presents potentially accurate information but lacks sufficient verification and precise source support for some claims.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on actions taken by Donald Trump without providing perspectives from those affected, such as Mayorkas or the Biden family. The narrative seems to lean towards highlighting Trump's decisions without exploring the implications or responses from other stakeholders. This creates an imbalance, as the article does not present a comprehensive view of the situation, potentially leading to a one-sided interpretation.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and straightforward, with a logical flow of information. However, some details, such as the legal basis for Secret Service protection and the implications of revoking it, could be explained more thoroughly. The language is neutral, but the lack of depth in certain areas may affect overall comprehension.

Source quality

The article cites Fox News Digital and mentions contributions from specific reporters, which adds a layer of credibility. However, the reliance on a single news outlet may limit the diversity of perspectives and information. While Fox News is a major news organization, incorporating a broader range of sources could enhance the reliability and depth of the reporting.

Transparency

The article does not provide detailed context or methodology behind the claims, such as the specifics of the executive memorandum or the criteria for revoking Secret Service protection. While it mentions the source of the information, it lacks transparency regarding the process and basis for the decisions reported. More explicit disclosure of how the information was obtained and verified would improve transparency.