US poets laureate criticize Trump's firing of the librarian of Congress

Apnews - May 9th, 2025

Outgoing U.S. poet laureate Ada Limón, along with predecessors Joy Harjo and Tracy K. Smith, have publicly condemned President Donald Trump's decision to fire Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden. Limón praised Hayden's dedication to promoting books and bipartisanship, expressing heartbreak over the administration's actions. The firing, which occurred before Hayden's term was set to end, has prompted concern and criticism from literary figures who valued Hayden's contributions to the Library of Congress, a historic institution housing a vast archive of the nation's books and history.

Hayden, appointed by President Barack Obama, was the first woman and African American to hold the position. Her dismissal has been attributed to disagreements over her approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion, and was criticized by the Trump administration for allegedly not serving the American taxpayer's interests. The event highlights ongoing cultural and political tensions within Washington institutions, with implications for the future direction of the Library of Congress and its role in promoting literature and the arts in the U.S. Harjo and Smith both expressed their admiration for Hayden's efforts to engage communities through poetry, emphasizing the potential impact of her removal on public access to literary resources.

Donald Trump Library Of Congress Carla Hayden Firing Ada Limón Joy Harjo Tracy K. Smith Poet Laureate Cultural Institutions

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively covers a timely and significant event, the firing of Carla Hayden, with a focus on the reactions from prominent poets laureate. It provides a clear and concise narrative supported by reputable sources, although it could benefit from additional perspectives to enhance balance and transparency. The story is highly readable and engages the public on issues of cultural and political importance, though it could further explore the broader implications to increase its impact. Overall, the article is well-constructed and informative, offering valuable insights into a contentious topic.

Accuracy

The story presents a series of factual claims primarily concerning the firing of Carla Hayden as Librarian of Congress and the reactions from former U.S. poets laureate. Most of these claims are supported by credible sources, such as direct quotes from Ada Limón, Joy Harjo, and Tracy K. Smith, which are consistent with the roles of these individuals and their capacity to comment on the issue. The article accurately reports on Hayden's historic role and the procedural aspects of her position.

However, some areas require further verification, such as specific statements attributed to the White House press secretary regarding the reasons for Hayden's dismissal. Additionally, the story mentions the American Accountability Foundation's labeling of Hayden as "woke" and "anti-Trump," which would benefit from direct sourcing or statements from the organization. Overall, the article maintains a high level of accuracy but would be strengthened by additional sourcing for these claims.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspectives of those critical of Carla Hayden's firing, focusing on the reactions of poets laureate and their commendations of Hayden's tenure. While it includes a statement from the White House press secretary explaining the rationale for her dismissal, the narrative is more heavily weighted towards criticism of the decision.

The story could achieve greater balance by incorporating more viewpoints, such as perspectives from supporters of the firing or those within the Library of Congress who may have differing opinions. Including a broader range of voices would provide a more comprehensive view of the situation and enhance the article's objectivity.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, concise language to convey the key points of the story. The narrative follows a logical flow, beginning with the poets' reactions, then providing background on Hayden's role and the circumstances of her firing, and concluding with broader implications.

The tone is neutral and factual, avoiding overly emotive language that could detract from the story's clarity. The inclusion of direct quotes enhances the reader's understanding of the stakeholders' perspectives. Overall, the article is easy to follow and effectively communicates the essential information.

Source quality

The article relies on reputable sources, including direct quotes from Ada Limón, Joy Harjo, and Tracy K. Smith, as well as a White House press briefing. These sources are authoritative and relevant to the story, lending credibility to the reported claims.

However, the article could benefit from additional corroboration, particularly regarding the American Accountability Foundation's comments and the specifics of the email notifying Hayden of her dismissal. Incorporating a wider variety of sources or direct access to the documents mentioned would enhance the article's reliability further.

Transparency

The article provides clear context regarding Carla Hayden's role and the significance of her firing, as well as the poets laureate's relationships with her. It explains the basis for the poets' criticisms and includes a statement from the White House to present the administration's viewpoint.

However, the article does not explicitly address any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might influence the perspectives shared. Greater transparency about the methodology behind obtaining the email or the criteria used by the White House for Hayden's dismissal would improve the article's transparency.