The article presents several factual claims, some of which are confirmed by external sources, while others lack verification or contradict other reports. For example, Hailey Bieber's solo attendance at the 2025 Met Gala and Justin Bieber's absence are confirmed by multiple sources. However, the claim that Justin was watching a hockey game instead of attending the gala is unique to this article and is contradicted by other reports that state he was golfing. Additionally, specific social media activity, such as Justin's Instagram posts, are not corroborated by other sources, raising questions about their accuracy. The article also includes unverifiable details about Hailey's outfit, such as the exact carat weight of her Tiffany necklace. Overall, the article's accuracy is mixed, with some well-supported facts and others that remain questionable.

The article primarily focuses on Hailey and Justin Bieber, providing a detailed account of their actions and public statements. However, it lacks a broader perspective, such as input from other attendees of the Met Gala or comments from fashion experts about Hailey's outfit. The article also does not provide any counterpoints or alternative views on the couple's public image or the rumors surrounding their marriage. This singular focus on the Biebers may lead to a perception of bias, as it does not explore the event or the couple's situation from multiple angles. The lack of diverse viewpoints limits the article's balance.

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a straightforward narrative structure. It effectively conveys the main points about Hailey's attendance at the Met Gala and Justin's absence. The language is accessible and free from jargon, making it suitable for a general audience. However, the article could benefit from more precise language in certain areas, such as specifying the sources of its claims or providing more context for the events described. While the overall clarity is good, the lack of detailed sourcing and context slightly detracts from the reader's understanding.

The article does not clearly cite its sources, making it difficult to assess the credibility and reliability of the information presented. The absence of direct quotes from primary sources, such as the Biebers themselves or official statements from their representatives, weakens the article's authority. Additionally, without referencing other reputable media outlets or providing links to social media posts, the article's claims about Justin's activities and social media presence remain unsupported. The reliance on unnamed sources or assumptions diminishes the overall quality of the reporting.

The article lacks transparency in several key areas. It does not disclose the sources of its information, leaving readers to question the basis of its claims. There is no explanation of the methodology used to gather information, nor is there any acknowledgment of potential conflicts of interest that might affect the impartiality of the reporting. The article would benefit from greater transparency about how the information was obtained and any limitations or uncertainties in the reporting process. Without this context, readers are left with unanswered questions about the reliability of the information presented.