Why Delaware's NAACP, ACLU are pushing back on Camden's ICE immigration agreement

Yahoo! News - May 6th, 2025

Several civil rights groups in Delaware are urging the town of Camden and its police department to withdraw from a new agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. This agreement, part of the 287(g) program, enables local police to enforce federal immigration laws. The Camden Police Department signed the agreement on April 29, becoming the only law enforcement agency in Delaware to do so. The decision has sparked concerns from the local NAACP and ACLU, who argue that such cooperation undermines trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement.

This development occurs amidst a rise in federal immigration enforcement activities in Delaware in 2025, with an increase in criminal deportation cases. The 287(g) program has been criticized for potentially leading to racial profiling, as seen in a previous case with Maricopa County, Arizona. The lack of transparency from Camden officials about their decision-making process has fueled further criticism. This partnership highlights the ongoing national debate over local law enforcement's role in federal immigration policy and its implications for community relations and public safety.

Ice Aclu Immigration Enforcement Civil Rights 287(g) Program Camden Delaware Naacp

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a well-researched and timely account of Camden's involvement with the ICE 287(g) program, highlighting concerns from civil rights organizations. While it effectively conveys the implications of the agreement and its potential impact on community trust, the lack of responses from Camden officials limits its balance and depth. The story is clear and engaging, with the potential to provoke meaningful debate on immigration enforcement and civil rights. However, greater transparency and source diversity would enhance its credibility and overall impact.

Accuracy

The article provides a factual account of the Camden Police Department's involvement with the ICE 287(g) program, including the date of the agreement and its uniqueness in Delaware. It accurately describes the program's task force model and its implications for local law enforcement. However, the story lacks direct quotes or statements from Camden officials, which leaves some details about the decision-making process unverified. The claims about potential racial profiling and community trust issues are supported by references to past studies and expert opinions, lending credibility to these concerns.

Balance

The article presents multiple perspectives, including those of civil rights organizations like the NAACP and ACLU, which express concerns about the agreement. However, it does not include responses or viewpoints from Camden officials or ICE representatives, which would provide a more balanced view. The focus is primarily on the opposition to the program, potentially skewing the narrative toward one side.

Clarity

The language used in the article is clear and accessible, with a logical flow of information from the introduction of the agreement to the concerns raised by civil rights organizations. The structure effectively guides the reader through the key points, although the lack of direct responses from Camden officials leaves some questions unanswered.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, such as ICE records and statements from civil rights organizations. However, it lacks direct input from Camden officials or ICE representatives, which would enhance the story's reliability. The reliance on secondary sources for some claims, such as the impact on community trust, suggests a need for more diverse and authoritative sources.

Transparency

The article provides a clear explanation of the 287(g) program and the concerns raised by civil rights organizations. However, it does not disclose the absence of responses from Camden officials or detail the methodology behind some of the claims, such as the increase in federal immigration enforcement. Greater transparency about these aspects would improve the article's credibility.