Work wives and happy hours are becoming extinct — here’s how to bond with co-workers

New York Post - Apr 17th, 2025

A recent study by HR platform Nectar reveals that more than two-thirds of workers desire closer connections with colleagues, highlighting a significant shift in workplace dynamics post-COVID. The research indicates that 80% of 18- to 24-year-olds are particularly longing for a 'work bestie'. In the past, socializing with coworkers over drinks or lunch was common, but the rise of hybrid work and reliance on technology like noise-canceling headphones has led to a decline in these interactions. According to workplace psychologist Craig Jackson, offices have become more insular, with employees largely ignoring each other. This trend spans across industries, with some workers finding solace in digital communication, while others miss the camaraderie of in-person interactions.

The implications of this shift are broad, affecting not just entry-level employees but also senior staff who may experience 'executive isolation' after promotions. Experts suggest that bonding over shared grievances can enhance social cohesion and support within teams. Employers are encouraged to facilitate social events to foster these connections, as a supportive workplace with at least five friendly colleagues can significantly boost employee satisfaction and career joy. The story underscores the evolving nature of workplace relationships and the need for intentional efforts to maintain them in a hybrid work environment.

Hybrid Work Workplace Friendships Nectar Study Craig Jackson Employee Isolation Social Connections Workplace Dynamics

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely and relevant exploration of the changing nature of workplace friendships in the post-pandemic world. It effectively highlights the importance of social connections at work and includes perspectives from both employees and experts. However, the article's accuracy and source quality are somewhat limited by the lack of specific data and detailed source attribution. While the article maintains a neutral tone and is easy to read, it could benefit from greater transparency and a broader range of viewpoints. Overall, the article is informative and engaging, but it could be strengthened by providing more concrete evidence and actionable insights.

Accuracy

The story presents several claims that are partially supported by data, such as the assertion that more than two-thirds of workers crave closer colleague connections and that 80% of 18- to 24-year-olds long for a work bestie. However, these claims lack direct citations from specific studies or surveys, which diminishes their verifiability. The mention of a spike in noise-canceling headphone sales is another claim that requires concrete data for validation. Furthermore, the article discusses the phenomenon of executive isolation and the importance of shared experiences for bonding, which are plausible but need empirical backing to enhance their accuracy. Overall, while the story's claims are plausible and align with general trends, the lack of detailed source support and specific data reduces the article's factual precision.

Balance

The article provides a balanced perspective on the topic of workplace friendships by including viewpoints from both younger employees and those in management positions. It features quotes from a workplace psychologist, employees from different sectors, and a CEO, offering a range of insights into the changing dynamics of workplace relationships. However, the article could improve by including perspectives from more diverse industries and demographics, such as remote workers or those in different cultural contexts, to provide a more comprehensive view of the issue. Overall, the article maintains a reasonable balance but could benefit from a broader spectrum of viewpoints.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. It uses straightforward language and provides a logical flow of information, beginning with the current state of workplace friendships and moving through various perspectives and expert opinions. The tone is neutral, and the article avoids jargon, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, the inclusion of more specific data or examples could improve the clarity of some claims, providing readers with a clearer picture of the issues discussed.

Source quality

The article cites a study by HR platform Nectar and includes expert opinions from workplace psychologist Craig Jackson and BrightHR CEO Alan Price. However, the sources are not sufficiently diverse, and the article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence from a few individuals. There is a lack of detailed attribution for the data presented, such as specific studies or surveys that support the claims about worker desires and trends in workplace friendships. The reliance on a single HR platform and limited expert opinions somewhat limits the credibility and reliability of the information presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of disclosing the methodology and sources behind the claims it presents. While it mentions a study by Nectar, it does not provide details on how the study was conducted or any specific data points. The article quotes experts but does not explain the basis for their claims or how their insights were gathered. Additionally, there is no discussion of potential conflicts of interest or biases that could impact the objectivity of the information. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the article's credibility and allow readers to better assess the validity of its claims.