YouTube’s new AI tool generates free background music for videos

The Verge - Apr 11th, 2025

YouTube has introduced a new AI tool called Music assistant, which allows creators to generate copyright-free instrumental tracks for their videos. This feature, demonstrated on YouTube's Creator Insider channel, is part of the Creator Music beta section. By entering prompts like “uplifting and motivational music for a workout montage,” users can generate and download several tracks for use in their video projects. This development aims to simplify the process for creators to find suitable background music without the worry of copyright infringements.

The introduction of Music assistant represents YouTube’s latest effort to integrate AI into its platform, paralleling innovations by companies like Stability AI, Meta, and Google’s DeepMind. YouTube has previously explored AI in music through features like the music remixer and Dream Track, which allow users to modify popular songs or create tracks in the style of specific artists. This new tool not only enhances content creation on the platform but also highlights the growing trend of AI's role in the creative industry, offering creators more freedom and flexibility in their video production processes.

Meta You Tube Deep Mind Ai Tools Lyria Music Assistant Copyright Free Music Creator Insider Lauren Stability Ai Audio Craft Music Gen T Pain Video Creation

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively introduces YouTube's new AI tool, Music Assistant, highlighting its potential benefits for content creators seeking copyright-free music. It provides a clear and timely overview of the tool's functionality and situates it within the broader context of AI music generation. However, the article would benefit from more in-depth analysis, including expert opinions and broader industry implications. While it succeeds in clarity and timeliness, it lacks transparency and depth in sourcing, which could enhance its credibility and impact. The story could also explore more controversial aspects of AI in music to engage a wider audience and provoke meaningful discussion.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports on YouTube's new AI tool, Music Assistant, which generates instrumental tracks for creators without copyright concerns. The feature's demonstration on YouTube's Creator Insider channel and its functionality, such as entering prompts to describe the desired music, are correctly described. However, the story lacks specifics about the availability timeline and international rollout plans. Additionally, while the story mentions other AI music tools, it could benefit from more detailed comparisons to enhance precision and context.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view of YouTube's AI tool by mentioning similar tools from other companies like Stability AI and Meta, which helps contextualize YouTube's offering within the broader industry. However, the story could include perspectives from creators or industry experts on the potential impact of such tools, which would provide a more comprehensive view of the topic.

Clarity

The language and structure of the article are clear and concise, making it easy for readers to understand the new AI tool's functionality and purpose. The logical flow from the tool's introduction to its comparison with other AI solutions is well-executed. However, the inclusion of more technical details about the tool's operation could enhance comprehension for a tech-savvy audience.

Source quality

The primary source for the story is TechCrunch, a reputable technology news outlet. However, the article does not cite additional sources or expert opinions that could enhance its credibility and depth. Including statements from YouTube representatives or creators who have used the tool would strengthen the article's authority.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding its sources, as it primarily relies on a single outlet without disclosing the methodology or potential limitations of the information presented. Providing more context about the tool's development process, potential biases, or conflicts of interest would improve transparency.